Thursday, January 20, 2011
You may have seen or heard the voices of myself, Past President Ben Whitten and others representing MMA in the press this week. We have been working hard to put forward the concerns of our members about Medica’s flawed individual physician rating program.
Despite our efforts to work with Medica behind the scenes and in public, Medica decided to ignore the input of physicians and move forward with their program. MMA met with Medica in December and shared its concerns. We sent a letter and requested a delay in publication of the program a week before its public release and never heard back from them. That is disrespectful of Minnesota’s physicians.
The MMA is concerned about known errors in the data, the inadequate time for review and validation and clearly insufficient statistical testing. Medica’s program could harm physician reputations, undermine the physician-patient relationship, and mislead Medica patients and purchasers of health care. MMA’s request that Medica address our specific concerns was completely reasonable and justified.
I am saddened that Medica chose to ignore our concerns and to dismiss our overtures to work together. Minnesota has had an admirable culture of collaboration between health care organizations in the past. To ignore the input of physicians is not the way things are done in Minnesota.
The MMA was a founding member of Minnesota Community Measurement and has supported state and federal policies to expand performance measurement. We have invested significant resources and physician expertise to inform and improve the state’s peer grouping program, which will generate cost and quality measures of physician clinics and hospitals.
Medica has truly missed a chance to work with physicians to design a useful tool and strengthen its relationship with the physician community.
Thursday, January 6, 2011
|Patricia Lindholm, MD,|
2010-2011 MMA President
Recently I read an excellent article in JAMA, “A Behavioral and Systems View of Professionalism,” by Cara Lesser et al that shed light on this issue.
The premise of the article is that professionalism is a set of competencies that can be taught and learned and that it must be practiced to be developed. Also we are capable of improving upon professionalism as we continue in practice.
What is professionalism? According to Lesser, professionalism is not an inherent character trait or attitude. Professionalism is defined as a set of behaviors. It appears that collegiality - working collaboratively with other physicians and demonstrating respect for them all in the service of the patient – is one of those behaviors.
The article also demonstrated how external factors in the practice environment can affect professional behavior. Financial incentives such as pay for performance are not motivators to professional behavior. Pride of purpose and intrinsic motivation are more important. There are therefore two essential players in the service of professionalism: the individual interactions between doctor and patient and organizational management and governance.
The good news of this research is that there are no hopeless cases. All of us can learn the skills of professionalism and all of us can grow and refine our professional competencies throughout our careers. This is one source of resiliency. And resiliency is the preventive medicine and antidote for burnout.
When our behaviors reflect our values we are whole people and much happier people. We owe it to ourselves and to our patients to work to make the small and large health organizations more conducive to professional behavior and to eliminate perverse incentives in the system.